Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) critical discourse (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: critical discourse


Is in goldstandard

1
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt43 - : ^**Is a Doctoral Candidate in the School of Education, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. His research interests are theory and methods in ESL/EFL, Educational Discourses and the teaching and learning of academic language and content to diverse students, Critical Discourse Analysis and Critical Literacy E-mail: [26]jaramirez1971@yahoo .com

2
paper CO_Íkalatxt294 - : Critical Discourse Analysis:

3
paper corpusLogostxt26 - : The development of modern critical discernment cannot be separated from the introduction of punctuation symbols that allowed the distinction of levels of discourse, but also to take distance from the statement and to mark subjective attitudes involved in enunciation. This study aims to establish rhetorical effects and stylistic differences of punctuation in the work of Nietzsche and compare them with two references of critical discourse of modernity: Kant and Marx . It was performed an analysis of the frequencies of modal punctuation (question marks and exclamation marks, ellipses) and of those punctuation symbols that sequence and distinguish levels of discourse (parentheses, dashes, quotation marks) in the work of Nietzsche and in some writings of Kant and Marx. The results raise a discussion on the key role of the parentheses in Kant, quotation marks in Marx and dashes in Nietzsche.

Evaluando al candidato critical discourse:


1) punctuation: 4 (*)
2) marks: 4
3) kant: 3

critical discourse
Lengua: eng
Frec: 379
Docs: 162
Nombre propio: 2 / 379 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 1
Puntaje: 1.479 = (1 + (1+3.58496250072116) / (1+8.56985560833095)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
critical discourse
: *How to reference this article: A. Hazaea (2020). Fostering Critical Intercultural Awareness among EFL Students through Critical Discourse Analysis. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 25(1). doi: [223]https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v25n01a06
: 11. Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
: 12. Wodak, R. (2001). Aspects of critical discourse analysis. En M., Meyer, & R., Wodak (Eds). Methods of critical discourse analysis. (pp. 6-31). Los Ángeles, Estados Unidos: Sage.
: 20. van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. En C. Caldas-Coulthard y M. Coulthard (Comps.), Texts and practices. Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 32-70). Londres: Routledge.
: 3. Chouliaraki, Lilie y Norman Fairclough. 1999. Discourse in late modernity. Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
: 5. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language. Londres y Nueva York: Longman.
: 7. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. Londres: Longman.
: 9. Escobar, W. Y. (2013). Identity-forming discourses: A critical discourse analysis on policy making processes concerning English language teaching in Colombia. PROFILE: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 15(1), 45–60.
: Abbasian, G. R. & Malaee, N. (2015). The Effect of Critical Discourse Analysis Instruction on Iranian EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension and Orientation. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(17), 1-20.
: Achugar, M. (2009b). Remembering and explaining a traumatic past: the Uruguayan military's narrative about the dictatorship. Critical Discourse Studies, 6(4), 283-295.
: Bernardo Paniagua, J. Mª, López García, G., Sancho Cremades, P. & Serra Alegre, E. (Eds.) (2007). Critical discourse analysis of media texts. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.
: Blommaert, J. (2005). Critical Discourse Analysis. In Discourse: A Critical Introduction (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics ). Cambridge University Press. [73]http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610295.003
: Bloor, M., & Bloor, T. (2007). The practice of critical discourse analysis. An Introduction. London: Hodder Arnold.
: CHOULIARAKI, L. & FAIRCLOUGH, N. (1999). Discourse in Late Modernity. Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
: Cots, J. (2006). Teaching 'with an attitude': critical discourse analysis in EFL teaching. ELT Journal, 60(4). Doi: 10.1093/elt/ccl024
: Dar, Z. K., Shams, M. R. & Rahimi, A. (2010). Teaching reading with a critical attitude: Using critical discourse analysis (CDA) to raise EFL university students’ critical language awareness (CLA). International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory, 3(2).
: Djonov, E., & Zhao, S. (2017). Social semiotics: A theorist and a theory in retrospect and prospect. En E. Djonov & S. Zhao (Eds.), Advancing Multimodal and Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 1-17). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315521015-1
: El Kadri, M. S. (2018). The Pibidian identity: A critical discourse analysis of the social actor Pibidian in teacher education programs. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 40, 1-11.
: FAIRCLOUGH N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis. The critical study of language. London/New York: Longman.
: FAIRCLOUGH, N., (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Longman.
: Fairclough, N. & Chouliaraki, L. (2002). Discourse in late modernity. Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
: Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1996). Critical discourse analysis. En T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse analysis (pp. 258-284). Londres: Sage.
: Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse. Discourse and society, 4, 133-168.
: Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis. The critical study of language. Essex, UK: Longman.
: Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Logman.
: Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Londres, Inglaterra: Longman.
: Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
: Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London y New York: Longman.
: Fairclough, N. (1995). Introducción. En Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language. pp. 1-20 London and New York: Longman. Traducción y adaptación de Federico Navarro para la cátedra de Lingüística General (Dr. Martín Menéndez).
: Fairclough, N. (1995a). Critical Discourse Analysis. London, UK: Logman.
: Fairclough, N. (1996). Technologisation of discourse. En C. R. Caldas-Couthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings of critical discourse analysis (pp. 71-83). Londres: Routledge.
: Fairclough, N. (2001) Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Longman.
: Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language. London: Routledge.
: Fairclough, N., Mulderrig, J. & Wodak, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis. En T. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies. A multidisciplinary introduction ([ ^2nd ]Ed.) (pp. 357-378). London: Sage.
: Fairclough, Norman 1995 "The appropriacy of ‘appropriateness’". En Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language. Londres: Longman, 233-252.
: Fowler, R. (1996). On Critical Linguistics. En R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (eds.), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 3-14). London: Routledge.
: García da Silva, D. E. (2007). Critical Discourse Analysis and the functional bases of language. En L. Barbara & T. B. Sardinha (eds.), Proceedings of the 33^rd International Systemic Functional Congress (pp. 932-949). São Paulo: PUCSP.
: Gee, J.P. (2004). Discourse analysis: What makes it critical? In Rebecca Rogers (Ed.) An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education. Retrieved from [45]http://jamespaulgee.com/sites/default/files/pub/CriticalDiscourse.pdf
: Guerrero, C. E. (2010). Is English the key to access the wonders of the modern world? A Critical Discourse Analysis. Signo y Pensamiento, 29(57), 294-313. [139]https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=86020052019
: Hanraham, M. (2006). Highlighting hybridyty: A critical discourse analysis of teacher talk in science classrooms. Science Education, 90(1), 8-43. Abstract consultado el 28 de julio de 2001 en [52]http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.20087/abstract
: Hart, Christopher. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. London, United Kingdom: Palgrave, Macmillan.
: Horvath, J. (2009). Critical discourse analysis of Obama’s political discourse. Language, Literature and Culture in Changing Transatlantic World, International Conference Proceedings (pp. 22-23). University Library of Presov University.
: Huckin, T. N. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. Document Resume, 87, 87-93.
: Janks, H. (1997). Critical discourse analysis as a research tool. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18, 329-342.
: Johnson, D. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and the ethnography of language policy, Critical Discourse Studies, 8(4), 267-279. Consultado el 9 de marzo de 2012 en: [68]http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17405904.2011.601636
: KhosraviNik, M. (2010). The presentation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers. A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Politics, 9(1), 1-28.
: KhosraviNik, M. (2017). Social Media Critical Discourse Studies (SM-CDS). En J. Flowerdew & J. Richardson (Eds.), Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 582-596). London: Routledge .
: KhrosraviNik, M. (2010). Actor descriptions, action attributions, and argumentation: Towards a systematization of CDA analytical categories in the representation of social groups. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(1), 55-72.
: Ko, M. (2013). A critical discourse analysis of EFL learners’ post-reading reflections in a critical literacy-based class. English Linguistics Research, 2(2), 1. [184]https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v2n2p1
: Kress, G. (1990). Critical discourse analysis. Annual review of applied linguistics, 11, 84-99.
: LEEUWEN T. van (1996). "The representation of social actors". En Text and Practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis. Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. y Coulthard, M. (Eds.) London: Routledge
: Lemke, Jay. (2005). Critical analysis across media: Games, franchises, and the new cultural order. En M. Labarta Postigo (Ed.), Approaches to critical discourse analysis (pp. 1-21). Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.
: Lewis, C. and Ketter, J. (2004). Learning as social interaction: Interdiscursivity in a teacher and researcher study group. (Rogers, R.., Ed.). Introduction to critical discourse analysis in education. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
: Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. Londres: SAGE Publications.
: Maillat, D. y S. Oswald (2011). Constraining context: a pragmatic account of cognitive manipulation. En C. Hart (ed.), Critical discourse studies in context and cognition (pp. 65-80). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
: Marsh, D. (2011). Using critical discourse analysis to raise critical language awareness in Japanese medical students: An exploratory action research project. (Master’s thesis), University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
: Menéndez, S. M. (2005a). Gramática, análisis del discurso e interpretación crítica: Las relaciones no tan evidentes. Proceedings of the Internacional Conference on Critical Discourse Analysis. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia. (Edición en CD).
: Molek-Kozakowska, K. (2010). Critical discourse analysis in media education: Some implications for critical media literacy. In A. Duszak, J. House, & Ł. Kumięga (Eds.), Globalization, discourse, media: In critical perspective (pp. 113-130). Warszawa: Warsaw University Press.
: Mulderrig, J. (2012). The hegemony of inclusion: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of deixis in educational policy. Discourse & Society, 23(6), 701-728.
: Myers, G. 2010. Stance-taking and Public Discussions in Blogs. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(4), 263-275.
: Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463-466.
: Oteíza, T. & Pinuer, C. (2016a). Appraisal framework and critical discourse studies: a joint approach to the study of historical memories from an intermodal perspective. International Journal of Language Studies, 10(2), 5-32.
: Oughton, H. (2007). Constructing the ‘ideal learner’: A critical discourse analysis of the adult numeracy core curriculum. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 12(2), 259-275. [200]https://doi.org/10.1080/13596740701387536
: O’Grady, G. (2019). SFL and Critical Discourse Analysis. En G. Thompson, W. Bowcher, L. Fontaine & D. Schönthal (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 462-484). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: O’Halloran, K. (2007). Critical discourse analysis and the corpus-informed interpretation of metaphor at the register level. Applied Linguistics, 28, 1-24.
: O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., Smith, B. A. & Podlasov, A. (2011). Multimodal analysis within an interactive software environment: Critical discourse perspectives. Critical Discourse Studies, 8, 109-25.
: Patterson, A. (1997). Critical discourse analysis: A condition of doubt. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18, 425-435.
: Price, S. (1999). Critical Discourse Analysis: Discourse acquisition and discourse practices. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 581-595.
: Rahimi, S. (2013). Promoting the reading comprehension of high-school students through critical discourse analysis. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 3(4), 56.
: Reisigl, M. & Wodak, R. (2016). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). En R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.) Methods of critical discourse studies (pp. 23-61). London: Sage.
: Reisigl, M. 2007b. How to name a discourse. Methodological reflections on Critical Discourse Analysis. Ponencia presentada en la Conferencia de Postgraduados de Aston y Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
: Richardson, J. (2007). Analysing newspapers: An approach from critical discourse analysis. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.
: Roderick, I. (2016). Critical discourse studies and technology: a multimodal approach to analysing technoculture. Londres: Bloomsbury .
: Rogers, R. (2004). An introduccion to critical discourse analysis. Nueva Yersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
: Rogers, R. (2011). Discourse Analysis and Education: A Multimodal Social Semiotic Approach. En R. Rogers (Ed.), An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education (pp. 233-254). New York: Routledge .
: Rogers, R. (Ed.) (2004). An introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education. New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
: Rogers, R., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D & Joseph, G. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research 75, 3, 365-416.
: Sirven, R., F. Polzenhagen et al. (2010). Cognitive, linguistics, ideology, and critical discourse analysis en The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Edited by Dirk Geeraerts and Herbert Cuyckens, Paperback, 1368 pages.
: Soler, S. (2018). The Indigenous People in the General Laws of Education of Colombia. An approach from the Critical Discourse Analysis Perspective. Wulfenia, 25(6), 13-35.
: Svarstad, L. K. (2015). Cultural studies and critical discourse analysis in Class 8. Sprogforum, 60(1), 28-36.
: Sánchez, W. (2003). World conference on higher education: Towards a critical discourse analysis (Disertación de Maestría). University of Lancaster, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
: Threadgold, T., & Kamler, B. (1997). An interview with Terry Threadgold on critical discourse analysis. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18, 437-451.
: Unger, J.W., Wodak, R. & KhosraviNik, M. (2016). Critical discourse studies and social media data. En D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research (pp. 277-293). London: Sage .
: VAN DIJK, T. A.,(1996). "Discourse, power and access" , en CALDAS-COULTHARD, R. y COULTHARD, M., (EDS.). Texts and Practices. Reading in Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Routledge.
: VAN LEEUWEN, T. (2008). Discourse and practice. New tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Van Dijk, T. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4, 2, 249-283.
: Van Dijk, T. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 95-120). Los Angeles: SAGE.
: Van Dijk, T. (2003). Discourse Critical discourse analyses. Em D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analyses (pp. 355-357). Oxford: Blackwell.
: Van Dijk, T. (2003). The Discourse-Knowledge Interface. En G. Weiss & R. Wodak (eds.), Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity (pp. 85-109). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
: Van Dijk, T. (2015). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. En R. Wodak y M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (pp 63-74). London: Sage.
: Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society. An International Journal for the Study of Discourse and Communication in their Social, Political and Cultural Contexts, 4(2), 249-283.
: Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Recuperado de: [47]http://das.sagepu.com at UNI Arizona Library.
: Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical Discourse Analysis. En: D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (eds.). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. (pp. 352-371). Oxford: Blackwell.
: Van Dijk, T.A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4 (2), 249-83.
: Van Dijk, T.A. (1996). Discourse, power and access. En C.R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and Practices. Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 84-104). Londres: Routledge.
: Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis, 1, 32-70.
: Van Leeuwen, T. (2003). The representation of social actors. En C.R. Caldas-Coulthard y M. Coulthard (Eds.), Text and Practices: readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 32-70). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.184.55lee.
: Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice: New tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
: Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice. New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: University Press. Wade, P (2002). Música, raza y nación. Bogotá: Vicepresidencia de la República. [ [89]Links ]
: Van Leeuwen, T. (2009). Discourse as the recontextualization of social practice: A guide. En R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2da edición) (pp. 144-161). London: SAGE
: Van Leeuwen, Theo 1996 "The representation of social actors". En Texts and practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. Eds., Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard y Malcolm Coulthard. Londres: Routledge, 32-70.
: Van-Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical Discourse Analysis. En D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, (pp. 352-371). London, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
: Weiss, G. & Wodak, R. (2003). Introduction: Teory, interdisciplinarity and critical discourse analysis. En G. Weiss & R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis: Teory and interdisciplinarity (pp. 1-32). Hampshire-New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
: Widdowson, H. G. (1998). The theory and practice of critical discourse analysis. Review article. Applied linguistics, 19, 136-151.
: Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: SAGE.
: Wodak, R. & Richardson, J. E. (Eds.). (2009). Critical discourse studies 6.4. London: Routledge.
: Wodak, R. (1995). Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis. En J. O. Varscheueren, J-O Östman & J. Blommart (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 204-210). Ámsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. En R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 63-94). Londres: Sage.
: Wodak, R. (2002). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (Introducing Qualitative Methods series). EEUU: Sage Publications.
: Wodak, R. (2002). What CDA is about -a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 121-138). London: Sage.
: Wodak, R. (2007). Pragmatics and critical discourse analysis. A cross-disciplinary enquiry. Pragmatics & Cognition, 15(1), 203-225.
: Wodak, R. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: history, agenda, theory, and methodology. En R. Wodak and M. Meyer. (Eds.), Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 1-33). London: Sage.
: Wodak, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis. En K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.), The Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis (pp. 38-53.). Londres: Continuum.
: Wodak, R. (Ed). (2013). Critical discourse analysis. Londres, UK: Sage.
: Wodak, R. y M. Meyer (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Londres: Sage.
: Wodak, Ruth. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. En Meyer, Michael y Wodak, Ruth (Comp.). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage, 63-94
: Zhao, S., Djonov, E., Bjorkvall, A., & Boeriis, M. (eds.) (2018). Advancing multimodal and critical discourse studies: interdisciplinary research inspired by Theo van Leeuwen's social semiotics. Londres: Routledge .
: _ y Ruth, W. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. En T. van Dijk. (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage.
: ___. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in transdisciplinary research. En R. Wodak & P. Chilton (Eds.), A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: Theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity (pp. 53-70). Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
: ___. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: ___. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, H. Hamilton &D. Schifrin (Eds.), [Te handbook of discourse analysis (2nd Ed.)] (pp. 466-485)Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
: _______ . (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Longman.
: _________ (1995a). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
: __________ (2004). Critical Discourse Analysis in Researching Language in the New Capitalism: Overdetermination, Transdisciplinarity and Textual Analysis. En Young, L. y Harrison, C. Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. Londres, Continuum.
: van Dijk, T. (1993). Principles of critical discourse análisis. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 249-83.
: van Dijk, T. (1996). Discourse, power and access. En C. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 84-104). London: Routledge.
: van Dijk, T. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. En, Shiffrin, D., Tannen, D. & Hamilton, H. (Comp.) The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352-371). Cambridge (MA), USA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
: van Dijk, T. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. En R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 95-120). London: Sage.
: van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. En C. R. Caldas-Coulthard, & M. Coulthard (eds.), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 32-70). London: Routledge .
: van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice, new tools for critical discourse analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
: van Leeuwen, T. (2009). Critical discourse analysis. In J. Renkema (Ed.), Discourse, of course. An overview of research in discourse studies (pp. 277-292). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.